\displaystyle \frac{\partial h}{\partial t} = \nu\frac{\partial^2 h}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\lambda}{2}\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}\right)^2 + \xi(x,t)
\displaystyle \frac{\partial h}{\partial t} = \nu\frac{\partial^2 h}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\lambda}{2}\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}\right)^2 + \xi(x,t)
Adding material at rate v to the surface causes it to rise by
\displaystyle v\delta t\sqrt{1+(\partial_x h)^2}
in time \delta t
Turbulent liquid crystals. Takeuchi & Sano, 2010
KPZ used to describe bacterial colony growth, flame propagation, etc.
The physics of each situation seems different.
What do we mean to say that each is described by KPZ?
How do we understand macroscopic matter in terms of microscopic constituents?
Talking about a uniform state of matter requires that widely separated regions are nearly independent.
Living matter is quite different in this respect.
\displaystyle H = -J\sum_{\langle j\,k\rangle} \sigma_j \sigma_k + h \sum_j \sigma_j,\qquad \sigma_j = \pm 1
\displaystyle \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} = D \frac{\partial^2 \phi}{\partial x^2}
Equation ‘smoothes’ \phi(x,t)
\displaystyle \phi(x,t)\longrightarrow \frac{\phi_0}{\sqrt{t}} \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{4Dt}\right)
…no matter what you start with!
\displaystyle h(x,t) - vt \sim t^{1/3}
Particles hop to right with some rate, if they can.
From hops to heights…
\displaystyle \frac{\partial h}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{2}-\rho
Think in terms of local density \rho(x,t) and current j(x,t).
They obey the continuity equation
\displaystyle \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial j}{\partial x}
Velocity v\propto (1-\rho), so
\displaystyle j = \rho v = \rho(1-\rho)
Putting it together gives Burgers’ equation
\displaystyle \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\rho(1-\rho)
\displaystyle \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = - \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\rho(1-\rho)
As we saw, \rho-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}, so this is
\displaystyle \frac{\partial h}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial h}{\partial x} + \left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}\right)^2
Compare KPZ
\displaystyle \frac{\partial h}{\partial t} = \frac{\lambda}{2}\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial x}\right)^2 + \nu\frac{\partial^2 h}{\partial x^2} + \xi(x,t)
Noise and diffusion are higher order effects
Polymer is stretched out in (1,1) direction, but attracted to points.
Wants to maximize number visited, subject to moving up and to the right.
This is the directed polymer in a random potential. It’s equivalent to KPZ!
Remember T \sim L^z. Here T = x+y, L=x-y, so z=3/2
This means: calculate the statistical properties exactly
Nope
Actually, it’s a struggle to define it!
Martin Hairer won the Fields medal in 2014 for giving precise meaning to the KPZ equation.
Thus we resort to models. If we believe that scaling behaviour is insensitive to details of system, we are free to choose!
Such models have played a vital role in our understanding of critical phenomena.
Back to directed polymer
Permutation (23154)
Longest increasting subsequences are (2,3,5) and (2,3,4).
The fluctuations of height of a KPZ surface, or of the energy of a random polymer, are equivalent to the statistics of the longest increasing subsequence of a random permutation!
Almost anything about higher dimensions (e.g. growth on a 2D interface). Critical exponents and scaling functions.
A rough-to-smooth phase transition?
Any generalization of the ‘tricks’ (e.g. random permutation) used in 1D.